for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Hydro (Kinetic)
Hydropower
Small (100-1000 kW)
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture
Energy generator, Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices
Irrigation
Methodology, Other
Authors: Bobvan der Zwaan, Agnese Boccalon, Francesco Dalla Longa
Journal: Energy Strategy Reviews
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/energy-strategy-reviews
Publication date: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2017.11.001
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X17300676?via=ihub
Open access: No
Related project: RANSRISK project (Horizon 2020 research andinnovation programme, grant agreement No. 642260).
Article funding source:
The Dutch Climate Solutions (DCS)programme of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs (ECNproject No. 52734)
Author location: Netherlands
Corresponding author email: vanderzwaan@ecn.nl
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.