for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Pellets, Agricultural residues)
Solid biomass conversion
various: pellets and solid biofuels, 2G-bioethanol and bio-oil
Heat
Heat for buildings
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Energy generator, Advisory services, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Solid biomass
Methodology, Procedure
Project`s acronym: AGROinLOG
Project funding type: EU
Project funding source: H2020
Project coordinator: FUNDACION CIRCE CENTRO DE INVESTIGACION DE RECURSOS Y CONSUMOS ENERGETICOS
Coordinator location: Spain
Coordinator email / Contact form: AgroInLog@fcirce.es
Project status: Finished
Total budget: 6385661.25
AGROinLOG tested the IBLC concept in three companies in Europe: In Spain at a fodder industry, in Greece at an olive oil industry, and in Sweden inside a grain-milling industry.
The business models designed for the three demo cases reveal that they improve temporal employment and even create full time jobs. Therefore, the implementation of the IBLC concept in agro-industries can help to attract and retain population in rural areas
1. In Spain, we have demonstrated that it is possible and profitable to develop an IBLC in the fodder sector based on the production of blend pellets with a low initial investment for the agro-industry, since they already account with the majority of the equipment necessary to carry out the new activity.
2. In Greece we performed the first ever demonstration of mechanized olive tree pruning harvesting using integrated harvesting or shredding systems; results from previous studies were only available for Spain and Italy. It provides a real example of the collaboration of several local value chain actors and serves as a model for other locations in Greece. Moreover, it serves to place these commercial technologies in action, being highly replicable to other olive grown areas.
3. In Sweden, it has been demonstrated that, from a technical point of view, advanced biofuels, 2G-bioethanol and biooil, can be produced from winter wheat straw. This is an important contribution to reach the goals in the revised renewable energy directive.
All demo cases contributed to increase the CO2 eq. emissions saving comparing to fossil-based alternatives (46-80 % savings).
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.