for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Solar
Photovoltaics
PV-arrays
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture, Livestock
Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices, Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Irrigation, Electricity
Other
Authors: Bastian Winkler, Iris Lewandowski, Angelika Voss, Stefanie Lemke
Journal: Sustainability (Switzerland)
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability
Publication date: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030801
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/801
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
Shell Global Solutions International B.V. (Research Agreement No. PT51346)
Author location: Germany
Authors` other locations: Netherlands, United Kingdom
Corresponding author email: b.winkler@uni-hohenheim.de
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.