for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Wood log, Agricultural residues, Wood chips)
Biogas/biomethane production
Anaerobic digestion technologies
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture, Livestock
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Solid biomass
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Zahida Aslam, Hu Li, James Hammerton, Gordon Andrews, Andrew Ross, Jon C. Lovett
Journal: Energies
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/energies
Publication date: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061793
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/6/1793
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for a PhD studentship for Zahida Aslam in the Centre for Doctoral Training in Bioenergy (EP/L014912/1), and a GCRF grant: Creating resilient sustainable micro-grids through hybrid renewable energy systems (CRESUM-HYRES), grant number EP/R030243/1
Author location: United Kingdom
Corresponding author email: pmzba@leeds.ac.uk
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.