for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Landfill gas
Biogas/biomethane production
Anaerobic digestion technologies
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture, Livestock, Greenhouses
Energy generator, Advisory services, Policy makers, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Electricity
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Hamid R.Amini, Debra R.Reinhart
Journal: Waste Management
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/waste-management
Publication date: 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.05.010
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X11002522?via=ihub
Open access: No
Article funding source:
Environmental Research and Education Foundation (EREF) and the Hinkley Centerfor Solid & Hazardous Waste Management (HCSHWM)
Author location: United States
Corresponding author email: hamini@knights.ucf.edu
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.