for Soil carbon sequestration
Tillage (conservation agriculture + CTF)
Open-field agriculture, Livestock
Energy generator, Contractor, Advisory services, Policy makers, Industry
Agricultural field practices
Tilling/ploughing
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Gebermedihin Ambaw, John W. Recha, Abebe Nigussie, Dawit Solomon, Maren Radeny
Journal: Climate
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/climate
Publication date: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8110124
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/8/11/124
Open access: Yes
Related project: CAFS-EC grant reference: 2000002575 for the project on Building Livelihoods and Resilience to Climate Change in East and West Africa: Agricultural Research for Development (AR4D) for large-scale implementation of Climate-Smart Agriculture
Author location: Kenya
Authors` other locations: Ethiopia
Corresponding author email: j.recha@cgiar.org
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.