for Soil carbon sequestration
Crop diversification
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Advisory services, Policy makers
Tools
DLEM process-based ecosystem model
Software, Methodology
Authors: Chaoqun Lu, Zhen Yu, Hanqin Tian, David A Hennessy, Hongli Feng, Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Yuyu Zhou, Tom Sauer, Raymond Arritt
Journal: Environmental Research Letters
Journal link: https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1748-9326
Publication date: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae9fe
Article link: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aae9fe
Open access: Yes
Related project: FACETS project supported by the Regional and Global Climate Modeling program
Article funding source:
Grant (#INRC 2017–06)from Iowa Nutrient Research Center, new faculty start-up fund from Iowa State University, NASA CMS (NNX14AO73G), NASA IDS (NNX10AU06G), NOAA Grants (NA16NOS4780204). US. Department of Energy and North Central Climate Science Center unit of the US Geological Survey
Author location: United States
Corresponding author email: clu@iastate.edu
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.