for Energy efficiency improvement
Precision agriculture
Fertilize reduction
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Companies
Agricultural field practices
Fertilizing
Software, Methodology
Authors: J. M. Yang, J. Y. Yang, S. Dou, X. M. Yang, G. Hoogenboom
Journal: Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
Journal link: https://www.springer.com/journal/10705
Publication date: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-013-9563-z
Article link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10705-013-9563-z
Open access: No
Related project: 973 Projects of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO: 2011CB100503 and NO: 41171188)
Article funding source:
Greenhouse and Processing Crops Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Author location: China
Authors` other locations: Canada, United States
Corresponding author email: Jingyi.yang@agr.gc.ca
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.