for Soil carbon sequestration
Tillage (conservation agriculture + CTF)
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices
Methodology, Procedure, Other
Authors: Annette Freibauer, Mark D.A. Rounsevell, Pete Smith, Jan Verhagen
Journal: Geoderma
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/geoderma
Publication date: 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.02
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016706104000254
Open access: No
Article funding source:
This paper was based on a report produced under Contract No. 2001.40.CO001 within the framework of the Communication on ‘‘EU policies and measures to reduce greenhouse gas emission: Towards a European Climate Change Programme (ECCP)’’, COM (2000) 88, Working Group Sinks, Subgroup Soils.
Author location: Germany
Corresponding author email: afreib@bgc-jena.mpg.de
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.