for Energy efficiency improvement
Efficient tool
GIS-MCDA model
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Advisory services, Policy makers, Companies, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Solid biomass
Software, Methodology
Authors: Jin Su Jeong, Álvaro Ramírez-Gómez
Journal: Energies
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/energies
Publication date: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122095
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/2095
Open access: Yes
Related project: uan de la Cierva-Formación of the Economy and Competitiveness of Spain (ref. JDC-2015) program, ICEER2017
Author location: Spain
Corresponding author email: jinsu.jeong@upm.es
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.