for Energy efficiency improvement
Precision livestock farming
Animal healthcare
Livestock
Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices, Tools
Irrigation, Milking robots
Other
Authors: Thomas Nyanda Reuben, Grivin Chipula, Thawani Mpatama Sanjika, Darwin Dodoma Singa
Journal: African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development
Journal link: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rajs20/current
Publication date: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2020.1765469
Article link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20421338.2020.1765469?scroll=top&needAccess=true
Open access: No
Article funding source:
Science Granting Councils Initiative(SCGI) and Malawi’s National Commission for Science andTechnology (NCST)
Author location: Malawi
Corresponding author email: thomnyanda@yahoo.co.uk
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.