for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Solar
Solar thermal
Photovoltaic and thermal collectors (PVT)
Heat
Heat for agri-processes
Greenhouses
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Advisory services, Policy makers
Heating and cooling of agricultural constructions, Agricultural field practices, Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Greenhouses, Irrigation, Electricity
Hardware, Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Tianyue Wang, Gaoxiang Wu, Jiewei Chen, Peng Cui, Zexi Chen, Yangyang Yan, Yan Zhang, Meicheng Li, Dongxiao Niu, Baoguo Li, Hongyi Chen
Journal: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/renewable-and-sustainable-energy-reviews
Publication date: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.020
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116310796?via=ihub
Open access: No
Article funding source:
Key Project of Chinese Academyof Engineering (2015-XZ-04), National High-tech R & D Program ofChina (863 Program, No. 2015AA034601), National Natural ScienceFoundation of China (Grant nos. 91333122, 61204064, 51202067,51372082, 51402106 and 11504107), Ph.D. Programs Foundation ofMinistry of Education of China (Grant nos. 20120036120006,20130036110012), Par-Eu Scholars Program, and the FundamentalResearch Funds for the Central Universities
Author location: China
Corresponding author email: mcli@ncepu.edu.cn
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.