for Soil carbon sequestration
Soil and water conservation techniques
Open-field agriculture, Livestock
Farmer, Producers association
Agricultural field practices
Planting/seeding
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Bernard Fungo, Joel Buyinza, Jude Sekatuba, Susan Nansereko, Gerald Ongodia, Phiona Kwaga, Scovia Mudondo, Kenneth Eryau, Richard Akelem, Patrick Musinguzi, Hillary Agaba
Journal: Agroforestry Systems
Journal link: https://www.springer.com/journal/10457
Publication date: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00473-6
Article link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-019-00473-6
Open access: No
Related project: Agricultural Technology and Agribusiness Advisory Services (ATAAS) project
Article funding source:
Government of Uganda with support from The World Bank
Author location: Uganda
Corresponding author email: bfungo1@yahoo.com
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.