for Energy efficiency improvement
Efficient tool
DayCent Model
Open-field agriculture
Advisory services, Policy makers
Tools
DayCent Model
Software, Other
Authors: Emanuele Lugato, Lily Paniagua, Arwyn Jones, Wim de Vries, Adrian Leip
Journal: PLoS ONE
Journal link: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/
Publication date: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176111
Article link: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176111
Open access: Yes
Related project: JRC’s Institutional Work Programme under the Natural Capital Soil Project (Project 702), Work Package 5037 “Soil for Climate Change”
Author location: Italy
Authors` other locations: Netherlands
Corresponding author email: emanuele.lugato@ec.europa.eu
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.