for Energy efficiency improvement
Efficient buildings
Roof insulation
Greenhouses
Farmer, Advisory services, Policy makers, Companies, Industry
Heating and cooling of agricultural constructions
Greenhouses
Methodology
Authors: Premaratne Samaranayake, Chelsea Maier, Sachin Chavan, Weiguang Liang, Zhong-Hua Chen, David T. Tissue, Yi-Chen Lan
Journal: Energies
Publication date: 2021
DOI: /10.3390/en14196014
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6014
Open access: Yes
Author location: Australia
Authors` other locations: Canada, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Spain
Corresponding author email: P.Samaranayake@westernsydney.edu.au
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.