for Soil carbon sequestration
Soil and water conservation techniques
Open-field agriculture, Livestock
Farmer, Producers association, Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices, Tools
Policies & Framework
Methodology, Other
Authors: Sonja Kay, Carlo Rega, Gerardo Moreno, Michael den Herder, Joao H.N. Palma, Robert Borek, Josep Crous-Duran, Dirk Freese, Michail Giannitsopoulous, Anil Graves, Mareike Jager, Norbert Lambersdorf, Daniyar Memedemin, Rosa Mosquera-Losada, Anastasia Pantera, Maria Luisa Paracchini, Peirluigi Paris, Jose V. Roces-Diaz, Victos Rolo, Adolfo Rosati, Felix Herzog
Journal: Land Use Policy
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/land-use-policy
Publication date: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.025
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718310470
Open access: Yes
Related project: AGFORWARD, Clarin
Article funding source:
Funding through Grant 613520 from the European Commission (Project AGFORWARD, 7th Framework Program); JVRD was supported by the Government of Asturias and the FP7-Marie Curie-COFUND program of the European Commission (Grant ‘Clarín’ ACA17-02)
Author location: Switzerland
Authors` other locations: Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, United Kingdom
Corresponding author email: sonja.kay@agroscope.admin.ch
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.