for Soil carbon sequestration
Grassland management
Open-field agriculture
Advisory services, Policy makers
Tools
SOC Stocks change throught the years
Procedure, Other
Authors: Xuyang Wang, Yuqiang Li, Xiangwen Gong, Yayi Niu, Yinping Chen, Xiaoping Shi, Wei Li, Jing Liu
Journal: CATENA
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/catena
Publication date: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104722
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816220302721?via=ihub
Open access: No
Article funding source:
The National Key R and D Programof China (2017YFA0604803 and 2016YFC0500901), the NationalNatural Science Foundation of China (grants 31971466 and 41807525),and the One Hundred Person Project of the Chinese Academy ofSciences (Y551821)
Author location: China
Corresponding author email: liyq@lzb.ac.cn
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.