for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Energy crops)
Liquid biofuels production
other biofuels
Mechanical energy
Mobile applications
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Industry
Vehicles
Biodiesel/PPO tractors
Complete solution
Project`s acronym: MacroFuels
Project funding type: EU
Project funding source: H2020
Project coordinator: TEKNOLOGISK INSTITUT (prof. Anne-Belinda Bjerre)
Coordinator location: Denmark
Coordinator email / Contact form: anbj@teknologisk.dk
Project status: Finished
Total budget: 5999892.5
"Increasing the biomass supply by developing a rotating crop scheme for cultivation of seaweed, using native, highly productive brown, red and green seaweeds. Combined with the use of advanced textile substrates these breakthroughs will result in a year round biomass yield of 25 kg seaweeds (wet weight) per m2 per year harvested at 1000m2/hr;
• Improving the pre-treatment and storage of seaweed and to yield fermentable and convertible sugars at economically relevant concentrations (10-30%);
• Increasing the bio-ethanol production to economically viable concentrations of > 4%/l and;
• Increasing the bio-butanol yield to 15 g./l by developing novel fermenting organisms which metabolize all sugars at 90% efficiency for ethanol and butanol;
• Increasing the biogas yield to convert 90% of the available carbon in the residues by adapting the organisms to seaweed;
• Developing the thermochemical conversion of sugars to fuels from the mg. scale to the kg. scale;
• Performing an integral techno-economic, sustainability and risk assessment of the entire seaweed to biofuel chain."
Realistically, seaweed-derived biofuels could be available in the market earliest by 2030. The MacroFuels’ produced fuels (vide supra) were tested with a stationary engine as well as road tests. Bioethanol and biobutanol were used as 10% blends (cf. E95). The furanic fuel was used as 5% blend with diesel as reference. All the blends performed well in both stationary engine test and realistic road test, with emissions lower than acceptable limits.
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.